{"id":1558,"date":"2021-05-31T12:28:52","date_gmt":"2021-05-31T12:28:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/covid1984.nohost.me\/blog\/?p=1558"},"modified":"2022-08-20T11:05:04","modified_gmt":"2022-08-20T11:05:04","slug":"le-sars-cov-2-est-il-une-arme-biologique","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/2021\/05\/31\/le-sars-cov-2-est-il-une-arme-biologique\/","title":{"rendered":"Le Sars-Cov-2 est-il une arme biologique ?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Une analyse pertinente par OffGuardian du retour en force de la th\u00e9orie de la fuite du laboratoire de Wuhan.
Sans affirmer, l'article interroge le surprenant revirement de l'opinion sur ce sujet et avance des explications sur les motivations r\u00e9elles de ce retour de la th\u00e9orie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Pour les articles qui ne sont pas en fran\u00e7ais, vous pouvez utiliser DeepL<\/a> pour traduire le texte en fran\u00e7ais.<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
OPINION<\/strong>

Cet article exprime l'opinion personnelle de son auteur.<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

OffGuardian - Coronavirus Fact-Check #11: Is Sars-Cov-2 a bioweapon?<\/a>
Temps de lecture: 6-7 minutes.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Sometime in the winter of 2019\/2020, when the coronavirus \u201cpandemic\u201d was still only incipient, a theory started doing the rounds that the alleged \u201cnovel coronavirus\u201d had in fact been grown in a laboratory, and either released by accident or deployed deliberately as a bioweapon.<\/em>
---
Au cours de l'hiver 2019\/2020, alors que la \"pand\u00e9mie\" de coronavirus n'en \u00e9tait encore qu'\u00e0 ses d\u00e9buts, une th\u00e9orie a commenc\u00e9 \u00e0 circuler selon laquelle le pr\u00e9tendu \"nouveau coronavirus\" avait en fait \u00e9t\u00e9 cultiv\u00e9 en laboratoire, puis lib\u00e9r\u00e9 par accident ou d\u00e9ploy\u00e9 d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9ment comme arme biologique.<\/em><\/p>Kit Knightly<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

At first, last spring, it was universally derided as \u201cmisinformation\u201d. Mainstream outlet after mainstream outlet chortled at the conspiracy theorists spreading their crazy nonsense. Some people said they were racists for blaming China. The Guardian blamed Russia, as they usually do.<\/em><\/em>
---
Au d\u00e9but, au printemps dernier, elle a \u00e9t\u00e9 universellement qualifi\u00e9e de \"d\u00e9sinformation\". Les m\u00e9dias grand public, l'un apr\u00e8s l'autre, se sont moqu\u00e9s des th\u00e9oriciens du complot qui r\u00e9pandaient leurs absurdit\u00e9s. Certains ont dit qu'ils \u00e9taient racistes parce qu'ils accusaient la Chine. Le Guardian a accus\u00e9 la Russie, comme il le fait habituellement.<\/em><\/p>Kit Knightly<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Recently mainstream outlets have been giving what they call the \u201clab leak theory\u201d a little bit of serious consideration.<\/em><\/em><\/em>
---
R\u00e9cemment, les m\u00e9dias grand public se sont pench\u00e9s s\u00e9rieusement sur ce qu'ils appellent la \"th\u00e9orie de la fuite du laboratoire\".<\/em><\/p>Kit Knightly<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

it could be a sign that the unified \u201cGreat Reset\u201d policy is crumbling and China is going to be scape-goated. It could be nothing but noise and chaos to distract people.<\/em><\/em><\/em>
---
il pourrait s'agir d'un signe que la politique unifi\u00e9e de la \"grande r\u00e9initialisation\" s'effrite et que la Chine va devenir un bouc \u00e9missaire. Cela pourrait n'\u00eatre que du bruit et du chaos pour distraire les gens.<\/em><\/p>Kit Knightly<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

it reinforces the idea that the virus is a real problem that needs to be solved, rather than a fear-based control narrative.<\/em><\/em><\/em>
---
il renforce l'id\u00e9e que le virus est un vrai probl\u00e8me qui doit \u00eatre r\u00e9solu, plut\u00f4t qu'un r\u00e9cit de contr\u00f4le fond\u00e9 sur la peur.<\/em><\/p>Kit Knightly<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

What, exactly, would be the point in a bioweapon which is no more deadly than common flu viruses? Why go to the trouble of creating a pretty much harmless virus in a lab?<\/em><\/em><\/em>
---
Quel serait, au juste, l'int\u00e9r\u00eat d'une arme biologique qui ne serait pas plus mortelle que les virus de la grippe courants ? Pourquoi se donner la peine de cr\u00e9er un virus \u00e0 peu pr\u00e8s inoffensif en laboratoire ?<\/em><\/p>Kit Knightly<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Maybe the virus was grown in a lab, maybe it just jumped from bats to people. Since all evidence suggests it\u2019s not very dangerous, it doesn\u2019t really matter.<\/em><\/em><\/em>
---
Peut-\u00eatre que le virus a \u00e9t\u00e9 cultiv\u00e9 dans un laboratoire, peut-\u00eatre qu'il est simplement pass\u00e9 des chauves-souris aux humains. Comme tout indique qu'il n'est pas tr\u00e8s dangereux, \u00e7a n'a pas vraiment d'importance.<\/em><\/p>Kit Knightly<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Une analyse pertinente par OffGuardian du retour en force de la th\u00e9orie de la fuite du laboratoire de Wuhan.Sans affirmer, l'article interroge le surprenant revirement de l'opinion sur ce sujet et avance des explications sur les motivations r\u00e9elles de ce retour de la th\u00e9orie.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[77,13,14,17],"tags":[26,27,28],"class_list":["post-1558","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-covid19","category-opinion","category-pourquoi","category-ressources","tag-opinion","tag-peur","tag-relativiser"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1558"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1558\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2150,"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1558\/revisions\/2150"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}