{"id":631,"date":"2020-11-30T13:33:32","date_gmt":"2020-11-30T13:33:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/covid1984.nohost.me\/blog\/?p=631"},"modified":"2022-08-20T11:09:20","modified_gmt":"2022-08-20T11:09:20","slug":"la-pcr-faussement-positive-pseudo-epidemie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/2020\/11\/30\/la-pcr-faussement-positive-pseudo-epidemie\/","title":{"rendered":"La PCR faussement positive pseudo-\u00e9pid\u00e9mie"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Un long mais tr\u00e8s int\u00e9ressant article de Mike Yeadon sur la crise du covid en Angleterre.
Il est int\u00e9ressant de constater que son analyse pourrait s'appliquer exactement de la m\u00eame mani\u00e8re \u00e0 la France, ou un autre pays.
Une similitude dans les approches incoh\u00e9rentes qui laisse perplexe...<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Pour les articles qui ne sont pas en fran\u00e7ais, vous pouvez utiliser DeepL<\/a> pour traduire le texte en fran\u00e7ais.<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
OPINION<\/strong>

Cet article exprime l'opinion personnelle de son auteur.<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Lockdown Sceptics - The PCR False Positive Pseudo-Epidemic<\/a>
Temps de lecture: 46-59 minutes.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

What was new was the belief that forcing citizens to run and hide from a respiratory virus with greater contagiousness than \u2018flu was other than a fool\u2019s errand. Acts of Parliament giving the executive a degree of power more suited to a war, and with it, a budget 10 times larger than any previous such emergency, were also deemed necessary, none of these being justified by the situation or by science.
---
Ce qui \u00e9tait nouveau, c'\u00e9tait la conviction que forcer les citoyens \u00e0 courir et \u00e0 se cacher d'un virus respiratoire plus contagieux que la grippe \u00e9tait autre chose qu'une course folle. Des lois du Parlement donnant \u00e0 l'ex\u00e9cutif un degr\u00e9 de pouvoir plus adapt\u00e9 \u00e0 une guerre, et avec elle, un budget dix fois plus important que toute autre urgence de ce type, ont \u00e9galement \u00e9t\u00e9 jug\u00e9es n\u00e9cessaires, aucune d'entre elles n'\u00e9tant justifi\u00e9e par la situation ou par la science.<\/em><\/p>Mike Yeadon<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

We were invited to \u201cSave the NHS\u201d by the expedient of not attending hospitals or seeing our doctors: soon both were heavily restricted and have remained so ever since. Most corrosively, broadcasters were and still are heavily constrained from free expression by innocent-sounding Ofcom guidelines.<\/em><\/em>
---
Nous avons \u00e9t\u00e9 invit\u00e9s \u00e0 \"sauver le NHS\" par l'exp\u00e9dient de ne pas fr\u00e9quenter les h\u00f4pitaux ou de ne pas voir nos m\u00e9decins : bient\u00f4t, les deux \u00e9taient fortement restreints et le sont rest\u00e9s depuis. Plus corrosif encore, les diffuseurs ont \u00e9t\u00e9 et sont toujours fortement limit\u00e9s dans leur libert\u00e9 d'expression par les directives de l'Ofcom, qui semblent innocentes.<\/em><\/p>Mike Yeadon<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The Government was told to expect a \u2018second wave\u2019, and a huge one at that. Th<\/em><\/em>is was mystifying. Virus don\u2019t do waves and no reason to expect an exception on a truly unprecedented scale has ever been forthcoming.
I hasten to distinguish what I have termed a secondary ripple from what SAGE means by a \u2018second wave\u2019.
The secondary ripple term recognises that not everyone will have been infected by mid-summer.
---
Le gouvernement s'attendait \u00e0 une \"deuxi\u00e8me vague\", et m\u00eame \u00e0 une \u00e9norme vague. C'\u00e9tait myst\u00e9rieux. Les virus ne font pas de vagues et il n'y a jamais eu de raison de s'attendre \u00e0 une exception d'une ampleur vraiment sans pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent.
Je m'empresse de distinguer ce que j'ai appel\u00e9 une ondulation secondaire de ce que SAGE entend par \"deuxi\u00e8me vague\".
Le terme \"ondulation secondaire\" reconna\u00eet que tout le monde n'aura pas \u00e9t\u00e9 infect\u00e9 au milieu de l'\u00e9t\u00e9.<\/em><\/p>Mike Yeadon<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Lockdown was started far too late to repress the spread of the virus, as even Professor Whitty agreed in giving testimony to a parliamentary select committee in the summer. As he said, the lockdown began after the peak of infection \u2013 the outbreak was already in retreat by Mar 23rd.<\/em><\/em><\/em>
---
Le confinement a commenc\u00e9 bien trop tard pour r\u00e9primer la propagation du virus, comme l'a m\u00eame accept\u00e9 le professeur Whitty en t\u00e9moignant devant une commission parlementaire cet \u00e9t\u00e9. Comme il l'a dit, le confinement a commenc\u00e9 apr\u00e8s le pic d'infection - l'\u00e9pid\u00e9mie \u00e9tait d\u00e9j\u00e0 en recul le 23 mars.<\/em><\/p>Mike Yeadon<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Personally, I don\u2019t think there\u2019s any evidence that the spring lockdown achieved anything in terms of saving lives from SARS-CoV-2, but there is evidence it contributed to some deaths, including deaths from non-COVID-19 causes. Reflecting back, months after, its main effect was to condition us to accept SAGE\u2019s guidance as this was followed by the Government and echoed by media. This doesn\u2019t mean locking people down is a sensible policy. The onus remains on its advocates to persuade us that it is, and I\u2019m afraid they\u2019ve not persuaded me.<\/em><\/em><\/em>
---
Personnellement, je ne pense pas qu'il y ait de preuve que le confinement du printemps ait permis de sauver des vies du SRAS-CoV-2, mais il y a des preuves qu'il a contribu\u00e9 \u00e0 certains d\u00e9c\u00e8s, y compris des d\u00e9c\u00e8s de causes autres que le COVID-19. En y repensant, des mois plus tard, son principal effet a \u00e9t\u00e9 de nous conditionner \u00e0 accepter les conseils du SAGE, car ceux-ci ont \u00e9t\u00e9 suivis par le gouvernement et repris par les m\u00e9dias. Cela ne veut pas dire que le fait d'enfermer les gens est une politique sens\u00e9e. Il incombe toujours \u00e0 ses d\u00e9fenseurs de nous persuader que c'est le cas, et je crains qu'ils ne m'aient pas convaincu.<\/em><\/p>Mike Yeadon<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

A \u201ccase\u201d is a positive PCR test. No symptoms are involved. A \u201cCOVID-19 admission\u201d to a hospital is a person testing positive by PCR before, on entry or at any time during a hospital stay, no matter the reason for the admission or the symptoms the patient is presenting. A \u201cCOVID-19 death\u201d is any death within 28 days of a positive PCR test. If there is any doubt about the reliability of the PCR test, all of this falls away at a single stroke.<\/em><\/em><\/em>
---
Un \"cas\" est un test PCR positif. Il n'y a pas de sympt\u00f4mes. Une \"admission COVID-19\" dans un h\u00f4pital est une personne dont le test PCR est positif avant, \u00e0 l'entr\u00e9e ou \u00e0 tout moment pendant un s\u00e9jour \u00e0 l'h\u00f4pital, quelle que soit la raison de l'admission ou les sympt\u00f4mes pr\u00e9sent\u00e9s par le patient. Un \"d\u00e9c\u00e8s COVID-19\" est tout d\u00e9c\u00e8s survenu dans les 28 jours suivant un test PCR positif. S'il y a un doute sur la fiabilit\u00e9 du test PCR, tout cela dispara\u00eet d'un seul coup.<\/em><\/p>Mike Yeadon<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Do note, you should at this point expect some excess deaths, if from nothing else, a number of people dying \u2013 mostly at home \u2013 from non-COVID-19 causes, a result of restricted access to healthcare for eight months.<\/em><\/em><\/em>
---
Notez qu'\u00e0 ce stade, vous devez vous attendre \u00e0 un exc\u00e8s de d\u00e9c\u00e8s, voire \u00e0 un certain nombre de personnes qui meurent - la plupart \u00e0 domicile - de causes autres que la COVID-19, r\u00e9sultat d'un acc\u00e8s limit\u00e9 aux soins de sant\u00e9 pendant huit mois.<\/em><\/p>Mike Yeadon<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The entire \u2018second wave\u2019 is supported solely on the back of a flawed mass PCR test, which at industrialized scale was never, in my view and the views of others skilled in PCR, capable of delivering trustworthy results.<\/em><\/em><\/em>
---
L'ensemble de la \"deuxi\u00e8me vague\" repose uniquement sur un test PCR de masse d\u00e9fectueux, qui \u00e0 l'\u00e9chelle industrielle n'a jamais \u00e9t\u00e9, \u00e0 mon avis et de l'avis d'autres sp\u00e9cialistes de la PCR, capable de fournir des r\u00e9sultats fiables.<\/em><\/p>Mike Yeadon<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The unprecedented \u201c\u2019second wave\u2019 conundrum is solved. It\u2019s of course not happening, but why a \u2018second wave\u2019 was talked up, months before unreliable PCR testing data was brought into service, demands deeper investigation. It\u2019s not a science matter: not unless the team predicting the wave can produce the scientific literature upon which the prediction and modelling was based.<\/em><\/em><\/em>
---
L'\u00e9nigme sans pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent de la \"deuxi\u00e8me vague\" est r\u00e9solue. Bien s\u00fbr, ce n'en est pas une, mais la raison pour laquelle on a parl\u00e9 d'une \"deuxi\u00e8me vague\", des mois avant la mise en service de donn\u00e9es de tests PCR peu fiables, exige une enqu\u00eate plus approfondie. Ce n'est pas une question de science : pas avant que l'\u00e9quipe qui a pr\u00e9dit la vague ne puisse produire la litt\u00e9rature scientifique sur laquelle la pr\u00e9diction et la mod\u00e9lisation \u00e9taient bas\u00e9es.<\/em><\/p>Mike Yeadon<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Un long mais tr\u00e8s int\u00e9ressant article de Mike Yeadon sur la crise du covid en Angleterre.Il est int\u00e9ressant de constater que son analyse pourrait s'appliquer exactement de la m\u00eame mani\u00e8re \u00e0 la France, ou un autre pays.Une similitude dans les approches incoh\u00e9rentes qui laisse perplexe...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[77,12,13,17,18],"tags":[21,26,28,30],"class_list":["post-631","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-covid19","category-mortalite","category-opinion","category-ressources","category-pcr","tag-confinement","tag-opinion","tag-relativiser","tag-pcr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/631","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=631"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/631\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2311,"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/631\/revisions\/2311"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=631"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=631"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crudelis.fr\/site\/covid1984\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=631"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}